Country Club of Asheville was founded in 1894 and operated at several locations before settling on its present ground in 1928, when Donald Ross was engaged to lay out a full eighteen. Contemporary club histories and modern directories consistently date Ross’s work here to 1928 and tie that date to the club’s move to Beaverdam Valley. The 1928 plan established the core routing still in use, climbing the valley walls early and late in each nine and threading several fairways along or across a small creek on the property’s lower bench. No primary Ross drawings have been published by the club, but the 2016–17 restoration team reported using “notes made during the original construction phase,” along with research from the Donald Ross Society and long-time members, as the evidentiary basis for reconstructing green contours and bunker placements to 1928 intent. That work closed the course in 2016 and culminated with a spring 2017 reopening.
Evidence that Ross returned for subsequent phases at this site has not surfaced in accessible records. Interviews conducted during the recent restoration instead point to significant alterations in the 1960s—particularly to putting surfaces—that deviated from Ross’s originals and were later reversed in 2016–17. Prior to the Mandell project, Forse Design lists “restoration” work for CCA on its client portfolio (without a year given), indicating earlier consulting activity, but documentary details and scope are not published; confirmation would require club commission files or archived board minutes.
Unique Design Characteristics
CCA’s personality is carried by a sequence of holes that marry grade, water and green contour with unusual clarity, and several of those attributes are called out explicitly in the club’s own hole-by-hole notes. The opener (No. 1) plays downhill to a short-iron approach into an elevated green—an immediate introduction to the site’s “up-to-a-target” approach motif that recurs at 4, 15 and 18. The ninth, a mid-length two-shotter, is dominated by a “thumb-print” green: a central depression that divides the surface into lobes and complicates recovery when one finishes on the wrong side of the print. That specific interior contour is a signature feature at CCA and was reconstructed in the 2016–17 work.
Creek strategy is distributed across both nines. At No. 4 a stream splits the fairway but generally sits out of play from the tee, while the uphill approach tightens the margin for a miss; at No. 5, the same water lines the left side, with fairway bunkers defending the safer right. The back nine’s 10th forces a choice off the tee around a diagonal creek crossing that the 2016 project deliberately “restored,” bringing the carry line and angle back into decision-making; the 11th asks for a long second while the creek rides the entire right flank. The 14th is a two-shotter where a crossing stream prescribes a lay-back club from the tee, then asks for a precise uphill approach to a steeply canted surface.
Elevation asserts itself most strongly at 15 and 16. Fifteen climbs straight up to an elevated target with a contoured fairway that rarely yields a level stance; club selection into the green is a recurrent challenge. The par-five 16th—once measured at 600 yards and promoted locally as the longest hole in North Carolina—offers a “double fairway” tee shot split by the creek. True three-shot sequencing here remains by design: execute positioning, then lay up to a preferred yardage, then attack a green that demands a controlled, spinning third. The long par-three 17th (~200 yards) is a fitting prelude to the finish, where 18 doglegs left and climbs to a slightly raised final green that courts a closing birdie only after placing the tee ball precisely inside the left bunker.
Collectively, Nos. 9 (interior “thumb-print” at the green), 10 (restored diagonal water hazard and elevated green), 14–16 (stream crossings and elevation staging), and 18 (rising, angled approach) are the clearest surviving expressions of the course’s original character, reinforced by the 2016–17 reconstruction of green sizes, slopes, and surrounds.
Historical Significance
Within Ross’s Carolina mountain work, CCA sits between the earlier Biltmore Forest (1922) and the public Asheville Municipal course (1927), and shares with both a deliberate use of grades to shape approach demands rather than exaggerated earthmoving. Its chronology at this site (1928) places it among the last of Ross’s Asheville engagements and makes it the anchor of a club that traces its private-club roots to 1894. That pedigree—often cited as placing CCA among the state’s earliest private clubs—adds institutional weight even if the course itself did not become a frequent host of national events.
CCA’s tournament record is largely regional in scope, with Carolinas Golf Association one-day competitions and qualifiers recurring on the calendar. The 16th’s length and the course’s “mountain-urban” views have been highlighted in media features, but the club’s primary architectural significance lies in the survival—and documented reconstruction—of Ross’s green forms on a compact mountain site, informed by construction-era notes and club memory.
Current Condition / Integrity
The 2016–17 project under architect Richard Mandell rebuilt all 18 greens, reestablishing interior contours and edges to match the 1928 design as interpreted from period notes and member testimony, and planted 007 bentgrass for greater surface performance. Bunkering was reshaped to better fit original scale and placement, with select removals of trees that had encroached on green sites and compromised both agronomy and angles. A new practice complex and a 10,000-square-foot practice putting green were added near a relocated first tee to improve flow. Minor routing adjustments were limited—mandated primarily by the new first tee and pathing—leaving the Ross routing essentially intact.
As played today, the course presents Ross’s corridor widths within a mature canopy, with creeks once again in meaningful play on 10, 11 and 14 and with elevated green targets restored at holes such as 1, 4, 15 and 18. The club’s scorecard lists 6,648 yards (Black) at par 71; other tees scale the course down while preserving strategic intent. Forse Design lists earlier restoration consulting for CCA, but the readily documented change agents in the last decade were the Mandell team and McConnell Golf’s capital program. To complete a full conservation record—precise 1960s green changes, any pre-2016 alterations by consultants, and any Ross field changes post-1928—archival work in club minutes, superintendent logs, and any surviving Ross correspondence or plan sets would be required.
Sources & Notes
“Renovations to Country Club of Asheville course close to completion,” Golf Course Architecture, Mar. 24, 2017. (Confirms 1928 Ross origin at current site; outlines research base—original construction notes, Ross Society materials; notes 007 bentgrass on all greens; new practice facility; relocated first tee and 10,000 sq ft practice green.)
“Renovations at Country Club of Asheville course reach completion,” Golf Course Architecture, May 18, 2017. (Details project challenges, phased work, tree removals around greens, and design approach; reiterates 1928 Ross date.)
Country Club of Asheville – Golf page (hole-by-hole descriptions), accessed Sept. 10, 2025. (Provides specific hole characteristics cited: elevated greens at 1/4/15/18; diagonal or crossing creeks at 4/5/10/11/14; “thumb-print” green at 9; 16 at 600 yards with double fairway; 17 as longest par-3.)
Country Club of Asheville – About page. (Establishes 1894 founding, relocations prior to 1928, and attribution of 1928 design to Ross.)
McConnell Golf / CCA blog, “Golf Course Reconstruction” (2017). (Summarizes scope: 007 bentgrass greens, restored creek crossing at No. 10, new practice facility, enlarged practice putting green.)
Top100GolfCourses – “Country Club of Asheville.” (Concise historical note: club moved to current site in 1928; Ross laid out 18; Mandell upgrade in 2016.)
Forse Design – Client Portfolio (previous work 2010–2019), listing “Country Club of Asheville – RE.” (Indicates earlier restoration/consulting activity; dates and scope not specified here.)