Immergrün was built in 1917 on Charles M. Schwab’s Loretto estate and later became part of Saint Francis University. The University’s current page identifies the course as “originally constructed by the late Charles M. Schwab in 1917” and presents the layout as a short, demanding nine that is open to the public. The same page, while not an architectural monograph, reflects the institutional memory of the course’s origin and present operation.
Authorship has been the central historical question. Many golf directories and club-adjacent descriptions have long credited Donald Ross. However, a 2017 report in the Altoona Mirror—timed to the course’s centennial—explicitly stated that “some factions assign the design to renowned architect Donald Ross while considerable documentation points to well-known architect Devereux Emmet,” bringing the long-circulating Emmet claim into the public record. This is consistent with occasional debates in the specialist literature/forums that note Emmet’s extensive estate-course work in the 1910s and his commissions for industrialists of Schwab’s milieu. Until club minutes, correspondence, or plan sheets from 1916–1917 surface publicly from either the Tufts Archives (Ross) or Emmet/Tull collections, the fairest reading is that the design credit remains unresolved.
What is unusually clear—given the tendency of Golden Age courses to be altered—is that after the 1917 construction the course avoided wholesale redesign. The Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation (in the context of a Ross-era regional survey) characterized Immergrün as “unlike most of his [Ross’s] courses, [it] has never been redesigned since its construction in 1917.” While that phrasing presumes Ross authorship, the preservation point is separable from the authorship claim: local tradition and on-the-ground continuity indicate that, whether Ross or Emmet, the routing and essential ground features were not later rebuilt en masse.
Unique Design Characteristics
Because no authenticated plan set is publicly available, feature-by-feature attribution (e.g., “Ross built X bunker” in a given year) is not possible from documentary sources alone. Still, three course-specific characteristics emerge from the site context and consistent descriptions.
First, the routing plays across a pronounced estate hillside, with green pads frequently benched into slope. This is not generic; it is a consequence of the Schwab property’s topography, still evident as the course wraps the Mount Assisi precinct. The University’s page stresses the “picturesque…short course” character, and contemporary scorecards show a par-36 nine that packs multiple two-shot holes into short yardages, reinforcing an emphasis on placement over length—consistent with early-century estate designs meant for walking and social play.
Second, the greens present small targets relative to modern municipal norms. While primary green measurements are not published, the persistence of par from 1917 to the present at ~3,400 yards implies defense at the green rather than via total length. In preservation literature for the region, Immergrün’s integrity has been tied to the absence of later “modernization” (e.g., added ponds, rebuilt complexes), which in turn has allowed original-scale green sites to survive.
Third, the course has very limited bunker acreage by modern standards. Contemporary photography and hole-by-hole user cards show modest sand usage; while this is not, by itself, proof of original intent, PHLF’s “never redesigned” note suggests that wholesale bunker programs of the postwar period did not overwrite earlier, sparer hazards here. In short: Immergrün’s hazard scheme today is conservative, with ground-contour and stance/lie on tilted fairways doing much of the work.
Without authenticated plans, it is risky to single out numbered holes as “the clearest surviving examples” beyond noting that the routing appears original and the scale of the greens and bunkering tracks with pre-Great-War estate golf. A defensible future step would be to compare 1920s aerials (if obtainable) to current orthophotography to test how closely each hole’s corridor, green perimeter, and bunkering align.
Historical Significance
Immergrün matters most as an intact, early-century estate course that slipped the heavy mid- and late-twentieth-century remodeling that transformed many Golden Age layouts. The PHLF survey’s characterization—“never been redesigned since its construction in 1917”—is rare language to encounter about any course from this period in western Pennsylvania. That integrity gives the site interpretive value whether one ultimately attributes the design to Ross or to Emmet. In the Ross corpus, an un-remodeled nine-hole estate routing would be unusual; in Emmet’s oeuvre, it would be a well-preserved example of his smaller-scale domestic commissions. Either way, the campus stewardship has preserved a period feel that supports teaching and public access.
Immergrün has not been a championship venue in the way of regional Ross classics; its cultural profile comes instead from the Schwab connection and the University context. Saint Francis publicly situates the course as a component of the historic estate and campus experience, helping to explain why the routing survived broader waves of modernization.
Current Condition / Integrity
Operationally, Immergrün is open to the public with an everyday fee structure; the University lists address and contact information and describes it as a “picturesque, yet demanding short course,” signaling no current private-club gatekeeping.
As for architectural integrity, the strongest published statement remains the preservation note that the course “has never been redesigned.” That does not mean it has been frozen in amber: like any century-old layout, it will have seen tree growth and episodic maintenance-driven changes (green edges, mowing lines, occasional bunker maintenance). But there is no published record of a named architect undertaking a comprehensive renovation that altered the routing, rebuilt the green complexes wholesale, or recast the hazard scheme.
Uncertainty:
The central uncertainty is authorship. The Saint Francis page presents the course’s origin on the Schwab estate and its public operation but does not adjudicate between Ross and Emmet; the Altoona Mirror’s centennial article states plainly that documentation exists for Emmet even as “some factions” credit Ross. Until primary documentation—signed plans, invoices, or letters—surfaces in accessible archives, directory compilers should treat authorship as disputed.
Sources & Notes
Saint Francis University, “Immergrün Golf Course” (community resources page with history/operations, address, public-play status).
Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation, “Donald Ross in Western Pennsylvania” (regional article noting Immergrün and stating it “has never been redesigned since its construction in 1917”).
Altoona Mirror, “Immergrun Golf Club celebrates 100th milestone,” June 18, 2017 (report noting competing attributions: “some factions assign the design to Donald Ross while considerable documentation points to Devereux Emmet”).
Wikipedia, “Devereux Emmet” (general reference for Emmet’s practice and period; not course-specific; included only to contextualize the alternative attribution flagged by local reporting). Secondary, non-authoritative for this site.